Last
month, I wrote about Lucia Konohana, a character with “cursed hands,” as I
called it. As a character she first seems cold, distant, ruthless and
order-loving. Simply see below to get what I mean. The idea that she has any
friends – though she is friends with the benevolent Shizuru Nakatsu – seems initially
ridiculous. How can someone so frosty make friends, one could ask. But what if
it was all an act? A façade intended to aid others – her self-perception is
negative, as evidenced by her persistent veiling of her hands. At least she can
conceal her hands but hiding her existence would be better; Lucia thus is
doomed to never feel a part of this world.
Figure 1. Kotarou Tennouji being punched by Lucia Konohana for heinous acts against all girls and women.
By now, I hope those concerned about not learning particular plot details have now turned back. The tale becomes quite morose as more is learned. Lucia, along with everyone else in Rewrite, has a tragic past that makes her truly a tragic hero. But here the tragedy transgresses the results of hubris and is thus both instructive and disarming. Lucia used to be Asahi Haruka the vampire, a being entrenched in urban legend as one who kills all she touches as shown below. Cursed is the oft-used word to explain her being. Then self-uptake of these negative “explanations.” Being cursed itself could be seen in a gendered light as the feminine form become something heinous. Lucia is then transformed into the monster encased in the body of a teenaged girl by urban legends, though her appearance betrays no evil; the monstrous Asahi is markedly defined by her femininity according to what Kotarou is told about the legend.
Figure 2. Asahi Haruka in the rain using Lucia's image.
Her
cursed touch is reflected by a dark mark that reflects corruption that eats a
person from the inside and results in utter destruction. Even when Lucia claims
to no longer be Asahi, she did revive her persona and in the process marked
Kotarou. She becomes dismayed upon seeing that symbol on Kotaru as depicted
below. Through this scene and the preceding chain of events, Kotarou’s affection for Lucia is displayed;
despite her condition and her status as cursed, he decides to be fully
supportive.
Figure 3. Lucia crying after realizing that she had cursed Kotarou. The leaf she was holding crumbled in her hand as a result of her power.
Lucia
is a being engineered by the Next Generation Humanity Project for a virulent
future where the environment becomes toxic and harsh to most life (depiction
shown below). As a denizen of the years to come, Lucia’s body reacts to the
present world as if it is toxic; thus, she produces poison in order to emulate
the conditions her physiology expects. Such an endeavor seems academically
plausible – indeed, some people view some form of this strategy as the most
viable approach to dealing with changing environmental conditions. Humanity fit
to the expected state of the world. It is fundamentally reactive and assumes
that humanity cannot change itself or the environment. Others think that
humanity should facilitate the regeneration of nature. Bioremediation of crude
oil to save wildlife from oil spills is but one of many examples where humans
use research towards the benefit of the planet.
Figure 4. Depiction of the toxic future world
predicted by the Next Generation Humanity Project. According to NGHP’s research,
the Earth will resemble this state in a thousand years.
Environmentalism
need not fit cleanly into either general paradigm. Another possible solution is
genetically modifying organisms. For example, yeast can be engineered to
produce high quantities of ethanol for biofuel production so that fossil fuels
can be replaced in the future. Perhaps removing the cause of damage may cause a
reversal to a healthier state (with the right conditions). Removing human contaminants
such as antibiotics or TCE from the environment, which removes humanity’s toxic
imprint, could then potentially spur regeneration if the Earth is allowed to
recuperate. Clearly there is not one or even just a couple strong ideas for
dealing with environmental waste.
Is it okay to engineer a human, though? Ethically? How about, academically? Technically? Could you engineer someone well enough to create a super human? Academically, as I’ve said, is clearly possible. A technical answer would have to rely upon specifications and answering the question “what meets the standards,” not simply create a mutant. The ethical question is rather difficult and requires knowing about Lucia’s morose backstory.
Is it okay to engineer a human, though? Ethically? How about, academically? Technically? Could you engineer someone well enough to create a super human? Academically, as I’ve said, is clearly possible. A technical answer would have to rely upon specifications and answering the question “what meets the standards,” not simply create a mutant. The ethical question is rather difficult and requires knowing about Lucia’s morose backstory.
Lucia
was forced to participate in experiments that transformed her into a superhuman
ready for the poisonous future barren of life. One of the lead researchers in the NGHP,
Brenda McFarden, chose orphans for this project, many of whom died in the
process. Having been given this “destiny” at the young age of 3, Lucia becomes
entrenched in the ultimate goals of the program. NGHP feels religiously
motivated to adapt humanity for the future by creating engineered beings,
rather than bother worrying about the environment. As a result, Brenda plays
the role of abuser by coercing orphans into this project for the purpose of
creating future humans. One issue with this nefarious plan is that no evidence
is provided by the researchers that this toxic future could come into
existence; it relies upon an assumption that the Earth cannot be changed. Thus,
the orphans are sacrificed towards an inhumane and scientifically unsound end.
Furthermore, her experiments had small sample sizes (n<10 easily) and low
yield (Lucia being the only success).
Lucia,
the sole survivor, becomes ensnared in the particular views of Brenda and her
cohorts and is deprived of a chance for self-definition. Though Lucia was later
rescued by Guardian, she carried her scars into her new life as an agent. The
success of the project with respect to Lucia, despite making her more capable
than present humanity, manages to force her to be independent of everyone
around her. This difference takes a physiological form, as I already said: she
secretes molecules toxic to all forms of (macroscopic) life on Earth as a
result of being engineered for the future. Lucia is emotionally scarred as a
result of this procedure, though she was able to remove any sense of physical
harm. Nishikujou, Lucia’s superior officer, describes the research as an unforgivable
violation of human rights. Given the difference between the project’s lofty
goals and its actual results, she does have a point.
Then the question comes up: can this project’s work be morally justified? Utilitarianism and Kantian ethics can both be applied to evaluate the morality of engineering Lucia to deal with climate change due to their relative simplicity. Clearly, at least according to Nishikujou, this research is abysmally out-of-step with international human rights as described by the United Nations. Not everyone views the UN as an authority worth following, however.
Then the question comes up: can this project’s work be morally justified? Utilitarianism and Kantian ethics can both be applied to evaluate the morality of engineering Lucia to deal with climate change due to their relative simplicity. Clearly, at least according to Nishikujou, this research is abysmally out-of-step with international human rights as described by the United Nations. Not everyone views the UN as an authority worth following, however.
Before
that, a few words on the technical aspects of this project. As stated earlier,
there are many ways to deal with humanity’s link to the environment in which it
lives. Tissue engineering can be quite powerful; as someone aspiring to
research in this field, I know that manipulating cells, genes, and tissues has
greater potential to fundamentally change humans. For example, vascular
endothelial growth factor (VEGF) can be engineered to encourage angiogenesis in
human patients, which can lead to many valuable therapies. Then tetracycline
(if a tet-on or tet-off system is used) could be injected (or degraded) to end
the therapy. This approach to tissue engineering has parallels with Lucia’s own
physiological dilemma.
Here,
Lucia was engineered similarly to achieve a change in physiological state,
which raises many interesting implications of modifying human beings at
molecular and higher levels. Controlling
her condition is achieved with a suppressant, so that innocent people do not
die. Brenda decides to, after convincing
Lucia to leave Guardian and rejoin her research program, make use of her superhuman
for her own purposes. So, Brenda injects Lucia with a drug that greatly
enhances her ability to produce poison – which again is reminiscent of many
therapies that make use of gene expression systems – and then Kazamatsuri City
is wiped out by a poisonous fog that coats the entire city, killing hundreds of
thousands of people. Such an act can be unambiguously called bioterrorism. In
light of her long-term goals of saving humanity in accordance with her
religious beliefs and destroying the Key, Brenda’s massacre seems quite small
in scope. Lucia was given a “choice” but only a superficial one for Brenda
could have simply taken advantage of the automatic nature of Lucia’s powers
anyways.
Utilitarianism
relies on the greatest good for the greatest number; this framework relies on
the sum of “utiles,” which are basically the vote of every person affected by
any given moral situation. Strictly speaking, only those who are completely
involved are given a utile. Lucia killed many people but ultimately she saved
the human population as a whole from utter destruction; clearly because all of
humanity gets a vote except for the relatively small group that died,
utilitarianism is overwhelmingly upheld. Brenda’s NGHP engineering Lucia is in
the grand scheme an act to carry civilization forward to a dismal future, which
constitutes helping mankind as a whole. (I should add that “mankind” only
refers to those who willingly reap the benefits, not people like Kotarou and
Shizuru who oppose Brenda.) Viewing the situation in an anthropocentric
interpretation of utilitarianism clearly suggests the absolute morality of this
endeavor.
This attitude entirely assumes a singular approach to environmental
change – that humans cannot change the Earth so they must simply change
themselves. A utile, however, can be extended to the Earth as a whole including
the many varieties of non-human life. Ecofeminism, animal rights advocates, and
ecological criticism as a whole suggest that humanity is not the only form life
that can be allotted a voice in ethics. Clearly a book like Silent Spring suggests the immorality of
using toxic compounds because of the inherent existence of animal rights. Only
mankind reaps benefits in Brenda’s plan, meaning that her actions are immoral
to the planet as a whole. Thus, this act of engineering Lucia is immoral under
utilitarianism.
Let’s
analyze the situation again but with Kant’s views on morality. Kantian ethics
stipulate that one must only act in a way that can be universally applied; any
action that becomes contradictory or self-defeating when universally applied is
thus immoral. In particular, any act that treats humanity was a means instead
of an end is morally unsound under this ethical scheme. Lucia’s reaction to
being seen as cursed or monstrous, revealed by Figures 2 and 3, leads her to
feel unworthy of being alive. Thus, emotionally Lucia has locked herself into
the role of being a “tool,” not a human being deserving of acceptance and
understanding. Specifically, she has been forged into Brenda’s conduit for the
vile goals of the Next Generation Humanity Project. Lucia almost allows her
life to end because she stopped feeling human. Clearly engineering Lucia
transforms her from a person (end) to simply a tool (means), which strongly
reflects the immorality of the action. If this action were universalized, then
many persons would become superhumans without perceptions of pain but would
likely feel isolated as a result of the ability to produce poison at will; then
many beings would be transformed against their will for a purpose that then
becomes their destiny. Clearly, universalization would be self-defeating for
this action. This act is then clearly immoral under Kantian ethics.
Kotarou
saves Lucia from abandoning her life by reminding her of her intrinsic value in
his life. Instead of simply saying that a better suppressant could be made, he
dowses her with affection to encourage her to not give up. Reminding Lucia that
better approaches at handling her poison could be developed is objectifying
because it frames her in terms of her “destiny,” rather than a true sense of
self that extends beyond being superhuman.
The
reader expects that I use the phrase “problem of pain” at some point. Or at
least mention pain in a more elaborate manner. Fret not, for here I will
connect pain to Lucia’s existential crisis. As a superhuman, Lucia has been
trained not to sense physical pain. After all, pain is simply conveyed
electrically to the brain via the peripheral nervous system, so ignoring pain
is completely possible for someone with such training. Pain is considered quite
horrific. Physical pain tends to be considered worse than emotional pain –
which coincides with stigmas against mental illness – because the latter is “all
in one’s head.” Though Lucia need not suffer from physical pain any more, she
is not protected against the burning emotional injury that she suffers from
isolation.
As
the reader learns more about Lucia’s past, her needing-a-hugness increases
tremendously as suggested by the below image. She is a superbeing who cannot be
harmed but that realization only makes being alive worse. At the same time, her
story indicates that pain plays an important role. This inability to feel
physical injury also dulls Lucia’s senses until everything becomes bland. She
can eat tremendously spicy food without difficulty but she cannot taste food
when she wants to enjoy in the presence of someone important to her (such as on
her first date with Kotarou).This lack of sense is linked to her lack of pain,
which ironically makes her suffer. The problem of pain is that it serves to let
someone know that something is wrong but also is an extension of the ability to
feel in all of the sense available to a human. Yet her inability to use pain as
an indication of environment ultimately makes her feel worse.
Figure 5. Kotarou hugging Lucia after she reveals
her identity as Asahi Haruka. Her normalized needing-a-hug value is 1.
This
theme of pain, whether physical or emotional, meshes well with Lucia’s feelings
of isolation. Earlier I said that Lucia is doomed, but that was inaccurate to
say. Clearly she is stuck in an unfortunate situation brought by on by both
inhumane and scientifically terrible research. But Lucia creates a life of her
own through the events of her route,
rather than being given that meaning. With the help of Kotarou and others,
Lucia is able to symbolically reclaim her body and dismantle Brenda’s
objectification, despite hardships faced.
This story unites the regeneration of damage done to the environment to
Lucia’s empowerment and healing into an overall message of cautious yet
powerful hope that the environment and humanity will both improve.
No comments:
Post a Comment